I am not surprised the Met Office described exceptionally mild days in winter as hot, they do it to try and provoke some interest in the articles they publish in their news blog, we all do it. It certainly worked with me, because I take exception with the term hot when used in connection with winter temperatures in the UK. Exceptionally mild days can occur in Autumn and Winter, but in my opinion not hot days, although I do think you can get the reverse term, cold days in summer. It’s not a particular scientific belief of mine and I can’t really defend it, it just sounds wrong. As well as the provocative title of the blog sounding wrong, the use of the 1901-1930 long term averages in their graph of warmest winter days in central England looks like it’s engineered to produce larger positive anomalies, and emphasise the warming and also looks wrong. Here’s the blog about the study I am talking about in all its glory:
A recent study by the Met Office reviewed the question of whether exceeding 40°C is now within the possibilities of the UK climate, after experiencing a record-breaking temperature of 38.7°C in July 2019. The results showed that under a high emissions scenario, where the world takes no action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, the UK could see 40°C days as frequently as every 3-4 years.
The research prompts further investigation into the UK’s warming climate – particularly in light of record-breaking winter temperatures, whereby Kew Gardens experienced a record-breaking temperature of 21.2°C on 26th Feb 2019. In a new study, the Met Office Hadley Centre’s Dr Nikolaos Christidis and Professor Peter Stott review these extraordinary warm temperatures. Their work has been published in a special report on ‘Explaining Extremes of 2019 from a Climate Perspective’ by The Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS). This special report presents assessments of how human-caused climate change may have affected the strength and likelihood of individual extreme events.
The research by the Met Office Hadley Centre is two-fold, reviewing the role that atmospheric state has on such extreme events, and then investigating the role that anthropogenic warming has on the likelihood of warm winter days, through a risk-based attribution methodology.
In February 2019 strong anticyclonic conditions brought warm tropical maritime air over western parts of the UK, due to deep anticyclonic activity. These conditions alone can raise the UK temperature over 20°C, even without the effect of human influence on climate.
However, 2019’s anomaly on 26th February is +5.2°C warmer than baseline conditions set over 1901-1930. This is 1.5 times higher than the previous warm record (+3.5°C), and six times higher than the 1900-2018 warming (+0.87°C), begging the question: Does anthropogenic warming under a medium emissions scenario (RCP4.5) influence the likelihood of the extreme event?
Extreme years like 2018/19 are currently very rare with return times (how often we would expect a threshold to be passed) of the order of a thousand years. However, when considering anthropogenic climate change, they become increasingly common, expected to occur once or twice a century by 2100. The chance of a winter day warmer than 20°C becomes 300 times more likely. This risk is expected to increase if we consider an emissions scenario greater than RCP4.5.
There is also an aspect of the intensity of extremes to consider: events as rare as 2018/19 presently correspond to a +5.2°C anomaly, increasing to +7°C by 2100, so winter heat extreme could not only be more frequent, but also more severe.
Dr Nikolaos Christidis summarises, “As well as summer heat extremes, we now see evidence of winter heat extremes in the UK being influenced by human induced climate change. Under a medium emissions scenario, the warm winter of 2018/2019 is up to 300 times more likely. However, if carbon emissions are limited, so too may the frequency and intensity of warm winter events.”
This evidence is consistent with the headline findings from the UKCP18 climate projections, taking the overall effect of anthropogenic climate change into account, milder winters are expected in the UK, with less frequent cold extremes and new high temperature records. The findings from this research are important to help the UK plan for future extremes, informing effective adaptation and mitigation strategies to limit impacts of climate change on UK society now and in the future.
The study looks like it was triggered by the remarkable warm day of the 26th of February 2019. That day produced a maximum CET value of 18.4°C which was 11.34°C above the 1961-1990 LTA. The high maximum didn’t make it the highest mean temperature for that day though, that particular record is still held by the 26th of February 1882 with a mean of 11.2°C, in fact the 26th of February 2019 with a mean of 9.8°C comes sixth in the list of highest mean temperatures in sixth place.
Perhaps Dr Nikolaos Christidis and Professor Peter Stott who are still presumably in lockdown might like to dig a little deeper into that particular date of the 26th of February in central England, and explain why they think the mean temperature on that day has only risen by 0.3°C in the last 248 years.
I’m convinced that many studies like this during the last year are from climate scientists with PhDs stuck in lockdown who reach for the nearest convenient bit of climate data available they can use to whack out a study to show just how much our climate is warming. I’m not for one minute suggesting that global warming isn’t a reality, it surely is, but I believe that the maximum temperatures on that particular February day in central England were a bit like a rogue wave at sea, with everything came together to produce a truly remarkable high temperature at each of the three locations currently used to produce the CET composite temperature.
Totally by chance we could see some exceptionally mild temperatures over this coming weekend across eastern England but not quite as high as those in 2019.